The disastrous public reaction to the Ministry of Transport's "signage plans," which aim to change the color of bicycle path signage throughout Saarland for at least 400,000 euros, has prompted the ministry to issue further explanations. However, these new explanations raise more questions than they provide clear answers. Angelika Hießerich-Peter, state chairwoman of the FDP Saar, considers numerous points unresolved.
It must be ensured that the planned funds for the new signage primarily go into the expansion of bicycle paths. New signs only make sense with new paths.
It is scandalous that the entire project is based on outdated GIS data – including an unusable sign register. The outdated data was at least financed by taxpayer money, so failing to maintain it afterwards constitutes a waste of public funds. Now a completely new register must be created that combines everyday and tourist bike paths. Furthermore, the existing green bicycle path signage was already funded from a subsidy pool and is legally subject to a funding ban until 2032. Additionally, the financing of regional bike paths remains unclear. Incidentally, the municipalities have to cover the costs of maintaining the signage; it is expected that the state will once again shift costs onto the local level.
The FDP chairwoman wonders why an expensive Berlin agency is needed to record the paths when experienced tourism experts in the municipalities and districts are deeply involved in the topic of "bike tourism" and know the locations?
Bike tourists consider it important to ride on well-developed paths. Whether a path has four or five stars – one of the ministry's main arguments for the action – plays a minor role for guests. Take the Saar bike path alone, which runs between Saarbrücken and Merzig alongside the highway, B51, and railway line; five stars are often unrealistic.
It must also be considered that many restaurateurs and accommodation providers along the routes have focused on bike tourists as their target group and use the current sign design for their businesses. They would also face new unnecessary costs in the pursuit of a uniform appearance.
Angelika Hießerich-Peter demands that the ministry fundamentally review its ill-conceived draft.
More information and current press photos for download can be found in our press portal.
